4:33pm: writing noodle: sampling error
This containing things I have been mulling over for some time, and recently again because of
shweta_narayan's recent posts on race:
One has a story. The story takes place in a world that is complex in realistic ways.
Given that there is a general preference for stories to contain characters, who are individuals (ideally well-developed ones), it is inevitable that each given character will have a specific ethnicity, gender, age, somatype, sexual preference (OK, there are stories where that last need not be visible, but it would seems unlikely to fit most stories for
all of those to be invisible to the reader), and... specific values of other traits where human beings vary, and where at different times in different ways some values of each trait have been considered more positive than others. (Excluding for the moment the option of setting one's story entirely among angels, aliens, AIs, or nonhumans beginning with any of the other letters of the alphabet.)
Given also a standard-sized novel with a relatively restricted number of characters (I love
253 but it does not strike me as a mode with which there is that much to be done as a general option), one is going to have a limited sampling, in one's heroes and in one's villains, of all those traits. Given any realistic world's culture and history, there will be some skews in that sampling; whatever the people of Generic Small Isolated Fantasyland Village should happen to look like, it would break my suspension of disbelief for them not to look
like each other, to a first approximation.
The problem; how then to write a story with protagonists and antagonists, who are kind of inherently sympathetic and unsympathetic respectively, that is as proof as possible against people saying "This villain is ethnicity X, this hero is ethnicity Y, they are clearly meant to reflect thus-and-such real-world ethnicities and therefore you're a racist," or "This ethnicity that is oppressed in your world must be judged on how well it reflects the reality of this ethnicity which is oppressed in the real world," or "Your world does not have problem A in it so therefore you are denying that problem A happens in the real world" and so on. (There is an awful lot of discussion on this subject online to which my considered response to "well,
I think X is clearly the issue that matters here" is "That's because you are an
idiot", but this does not tend to make for constructive discourse so I avoid such debates.)
I write in genre specifically because I do not feel real-world settings are of necessity the best way to address real-world things worth talking about; one of the great things SF and fantasy have to recommend them is being able to talk to things from outside, or to address some aspects in depth without getting entangled in endless ramifications in other directions.